Minister advises on smooth, soft transport cost system  

Nigeria’s transport minister Rotimi Amaechi have called on the Committee of Experts, Union of African Shippers Council (UASC), to eliminate bottlenecks that would inflate high costs in the system.  

He said that all elements of cost relating to delays, corrupt practices should be avoided in service delivery.  

Amaechi, who was represented by Auwal Suleiman, Director Maritime Transport in the Ministry, said this at the sensitisation workshop on African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCTA) of UASC.  

”I wish to draw the attention of the UASC to the inter-relationship between the cost of transport and trade.  

”Transport provides mobility that ensures movement of goods from production centres to areas where they are mostly needed. High transport cost translates to high landing cost for goods.  

”In Sub-Saharan Africa, the proportion of transport cost in the overall cost of goods is between 35-40 per cent, while in developed economies of Europe, Asia and America it is less than 10 per cent.  

”It is therefore the duty of your committee to analyse the cost component of the maritime transport cost in the region and ensure that all elements of cost relating to delays, corrupt practices are eliminated from the system.  

” We must identify the anti-competitive behaviours of multinational shipping operators in the region which is directly linked to the high cost of transport in West and Central Africa,” he said.  

According to him, the federal government is aware of the unreasonably high cost of transportation of goods to and from the sub-regional ports.  

He said this was due to high freight rates, poor infrastructure and arbitrary surcharges such as war risk surcharges, port recovery, port congestion, peak season surcharges, Bunker Adjustment and Currency Adjustment Factor among others.  

”I am equally aware that the member councils of the Union are concerned about the lack of consultation, timing and cost structure of these surcharges.  

“These surcharges are mostly unilateral and at times new nomenclature introduced by the multinational shipping companies/lines without consultation with the sub-regional authorities or the shippers.  

” The process of the introduction of these surcharges lack transparency and may not be based on verifiable and available statistics.  

”These surcharges amount to huge sums of capital flight from the sub-regional economies and thereby depleting the limited foreign reserve,’’ he explained.  

More=Nation=