BudgIT, civic technology organisation, has warned Cross River state government against continuing with its proposed N648 billion superhighway project.
The organisation said that it based its advice on the “undue financial hazard and avoidable hardship that would plague the state for the next hundred years should the government compound its existing debt burden with the project”.
In a statement issued by its Communication Lead, Shakir Akorede, in Abuja, the organisation alleged that the state had already transmitted a letter to the state House of Assembly to approve modalities for the repayment through “Irrevocable Standing Payment Order (ISPO) for N300 million per month for a period of 180 years.”
It described the project as overly ambitious, superfluous and almost a misplaced priority.
“For the umpteenth time, BudgIT is blowing alarm over this attempt to hold public resources to ransom.
“We deem the project overly ambitious, superfluous and almost a misplaced priority especially – besides its viability to investors – when there has been hardly any explanation on ‘infallible plans’ to upscale the state revenue and clear cumulative debts let alone fix the human and environmental costs of the project,” the organisation said in the statement.
According to BudgIT, the project, estimated at N648 billion, fails all tests of fiscal sustainability and proper procurement process.
It said the state government has failed to name the investors, four years down the drain.
The statement reads: “With a budget estimate of N648 billion, the 275km Superhighway fails all tests of fiscal sustainability and proper procurement process, as the state government has unacceptably failed to name the investors, four years down the drain.
“The purported appointment of MESSRS SYDNEY Construction Company as contractors for the Superhighway was carried out without a clear, transparent tender process, we maintain.
“Cross River has the 4th largest external debt among Nigerian states all thanks to its obsession with phantom projects without federal government institutional support. As of December 31, 2018, the state’s domestic debt stands at N167.96 billion, according to the Debt Management Office of Nigeria (DMO).
“Ostensibly, it is financially myopic for the state to pursue this project, especially with its approved budget not reflecting the realities of its total revenue uptake.
“In the whole of 2017, Cross River was only able to generate total revenue of N41.6 billion, with its internally generated revenue accounting for 34.58% – N18.1bn. Yet, the government has come up with a proposed budget of N1.4 trillion for the 2019 fiscal year.
“The State government claims that investors will make returns on their investment through collected toll fees from vehicles and trucks that ply the highway, evacuating the proposed Bakassi deep sea port.
“Our analysis has, however, showed that it will take over 100 years for the funds to be recouped.
“This has been validated by the ISPO request. More so, the Bakassi deep sea port is still yet to exist, and up until now, no organisation has signed up to the funding of the deep-sea port project.
“Considering the poor conditions of other “mega-projects” embarked upon by the state government such as the Tinapa project, an expensive outlay that collapsed with weak port infrastructure and lack of connection to the grid, and the rot in Obudu Cattle Ranch, all projects that have had little or no impact on the livelihood of the citizens, it would not be wise for the government of Cross River to ransom the future generations with unnecessary debt that would take two centuries to vanish.
“Our observation in the past is that state governments get clearance from the Ministry of Finance/Debt Management Office before they can proceed on new debts.We are alarmed that the Minister of Finance is quiet on this issue just as we are shocked to observe the deafening silence of the federal government, which seemingly means a “go ahead” nod.
“As much as we encourage innovative ideas and are eager to see state governments turbocharge their internal revenues and assert fiscal independence, we believe this project is a wrong step in the wrong direction, as it doesn’t conform to the three pillars of sustainable development—economic growth, social development and environmental protection.”
BudgIT advised the state government to focus its funds on viable and more financially realistic projects such as information technology hubs, renewable energy facilities for Agric processing, stronger eco-tourism profile for the state and large-scale empowerments for local SMEs.
